In a move that many might wrongly label a shameless cash grab, I am splitting my last part of this series into two parts for creative reasons. I have found that the story warrants more time, and so I will split the analysis of the last part to better let the content breath. There will be no bloat or filler in this writing, and this decision has nothing to do with the massive popularity of this series (heh), it is purely creative….GOT IT?
This section will focus on the Pukel men, Imrahil, Gondor, and the Grey Company while the next part will address Saurman and Scouring.
Change #23: Where is the Grey Company?
In the books, Aragorn is anxious to get to Gondor when a mysterious company arrives to remind him of an ancient prophecy regarding himself and “The Paths of the Dead”. This company turns out to be his comrades at arms, the Rangers of the North, with Elrond’s two sons Elrohir and Elladan, as part of the group. The company also comes bearing a token from Arwen pledging Aragorn her commitment and optimism for his cause.
The books replace this event with Elrond himself coming mysteriously in the night to Aragorn bearing both this same prophecy as well as the reforged Anduril. I struggled with Aragorn’s self doubt throughout the films, but none is present in this third film, and Aragorn is a new man once he retains the famed blade of his ancestors.
I am of split mind on this change, but ultimately think that Jackson was right to condense and simplify here by making a known character deliver the news instead of a troop of new characters. However, it would have been undeniably awesome to see Aragorn’s company at work in Pelennor and on the paths of the dead. This could have been an awesome group of warriors that would have given insight into Aragorn’s life as a Ranger. At the end of the day though, it would not progress the main story, and it is decisions like these that made the books filmable. Kudos to Jackson on recognizing the gravitas the prophecy of Aragorn taking the paths of the dead and keeping that part of the story intact in an elegant manner. I loved Elrond’s scene also because of the work the movies had done already establishing the obvious tension of Elrond disliking Arwen’s forsaking of immortality for Aragorn, a man who was beloved as a son by Elrond.
Change #24: Ghan Buri Ghan
In the books, the Rohirrim learn from advance scouts that the road to Gondor is held against them, and they make their way through a forest owned by the ancient Pukel men. As Theoden rides through this land, the Pukel men make their presence known, and their leader Ghan Buri Ghan offers to show a secret way to Gondor as help to the forces of good. None of this is even hinted at in the films.
This change is another condensed moment that makes sense given the already tremendous runtime of Return, but is also distinct in that it is a major part of the book that does not even get a nod in the films. Usually a visual gag or throwaway line are used to make a nod at book omissions, but not in this case. While it would be hard seeing the Pukel men used in the films, it would address one of the oldest criticisms of Tolkien which is that only white people are virtuous while the dark skinned natives of Harad and the East are always evil. The goodness of Ghan Buri Ghan is a direct counter to this argument, and was another character who appeared to be savage and ignorant, but proved to be wise, patient, and virtuous. This would have been a really neat thing to visualize, and is another scene that shows someday (probably too soon) when LOTR is remade, the results could be dramatically different from Jackson’s masterpieces.
Change #25: Imrahil, Beregond, Bergil
In the books, Imrahil comes into Gondor to swell their ranks, and is regarded as an important character. Meanwhile, Beregond and his son Bergil are introduced to be Pippin’s friends in Minas Tirith. Bergil doles out expository information about new characters, and Beregond ends up slaying guards to keep Denethor from burning Faramir alive.
I am going to go off on a bit of a tangent here about a couple of issues, but first I will sum up my thoughts on changing these characters by omitting them from the movies. Imrahil should be omitted because he is largely irrelevant to the story, while Beregond and Bergil are not as clearly tangential. The Minas Tirith chapter of the book is extraordinarily long winded (everyone points to Treebeard for length, but I will hold this chapter up as comparable), but these two give personality to common men in Gondor while making Pippin a protagonist instead of luggage. The movie did a great job with Pippin, but I have to think that introducing Beregond and having him slay guards to protect his lord Faramir could have been powerful on screen. I am not going to quibble overmuch, but it could have been cool.
On another note, I should mention two large issues in this part of the story that were difficult for the filmmakers, and address how well I thought they pulled it off. These issues are Denethor’s death and the winning of the Battle of Pelennor.
Denethor is a real ass by any estimation, and his portrayal in the films (while being less subtle) essentially nailed down that he was awful to Faramir, was full of his own importance, and was mistrustful of even good people who he thought a threat to his power (Gandalf, Aragorn). However, his decision to burn himself alive was tragic in the books, and was largely the same in the film until Jackson decided to have him inexplicably run a mile and jump off of the walls of the city. In my opinion, this move completely undermines the horror of what Denethor was trying to do, and I always found it to be an incredibly tone-deaf decision by PJ. I assume that he wanted to transition back to the battle here, but cutting to the battle in this manner was a big mistake, and another instance of an unnecessarily over the top moment that lacked subtlety or lyricism.
The final topic for this post is the handling of Pelennor and Jackson’s difficulty with the storyline of that battle. It makes perfect sense that from a story perspective, it would have been easier to film a losing battle at Pelennor which results in all survivors gathering to make one last hopeless attempt at the gates of Mordor. It does undermine the threat and terror of Sauron when his forces are getting licked in every battle, and it made a difficult film transition. I partially think that if PJ were making these films now and had done Hobbit first, that he might simply have allowed the orcs to win at Pelennor, but he likely felt little ability to make such a call back in the LOTR days.
The battle is very well-staged, but I think it put the cap on a disturbing trend that Jackson has strangely stuck with even during the Hobbit films, Legolas the Fool. Legolas went from walking on snow (in the books) and nondescriptly jumping across a chain to defeat a troll (perhaps a book send-off to him walking a rope across a river in Lorien) to single handedly massacring a troop of Haradrim and an oliphaunt while surfing down the trunk. I really do not know how the understated effects in Fellowship led to the ridiculous nature of Legolas’s antics in all subsequent Middle Earth films that he appears in. Letting Legolas have extreme archery skills and balance = good, allowing Legolas to be a supernatural force at a level higher than even the greatest human warriors = over the top.
Finally, I had some beef with the manner in which the Army of the Dead just scrubbed Minas Tirith like they were soap suds. The book’s version of the army spreading abject terror to all living things in their path made for a much more compelling victory as the hope of the dark army is dashed when the Corsairs of Umbar arrive bearing an undead army and Aragorn unleashed. The fear of this army combined with the loss of the Witch King turns the battle into a rout, which I personally think should not have been changed in the movie. With that said, the battle is satisfying and awesome, but I feel it could have been much better with these slight alterations.